BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//ERCST - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:ERCST
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://ercst.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for ERCST
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20170101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20181012T093000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20181012T123000
DTSTAMP:20260528T094046
CREATED:20190110T142118Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20190110T142118Z
UID:9938-1539336600-1539347400@ercst.org
SUMMARY:EU ETS: Impacts of the new clean energy package targets on the MSR
DESCRIPTION:The Market Stability Reserve was put in place to address the current surplus of EUA’s in the market\, as well as “normal” levels of surplus that may emerge in future years. The performance of the MSR is therefore critical to the well-functioning of the EU ETS. However\, the parameters have not been tested in real life\, and many were put in place a while ago\, especially the thresholds. As the MSR starts to operate\, monitoring its parameters and their fit with the current environment is important.\nPolicies that support the deployment of renewable energy sources (RES) and the improvement of energy efficiency (EE) will continue to drive emission reductions in the EU\, effectively ‘overlapping’ with the EU ETS\, and ultimately limiting its role as a driver for decarbonization. The recently agreed targets of the 2030 EU Energy package (32% for renewables and 32\,5% for energy efficiency) will certainly lead to additional CO2 reductions in EU ETS sectors and will further impact the supply- demand balance in the market.\nTherefore\, in spite of the doubling of its withdrawal rate until 2023\, the MSR may not\, under certain conditions\, be able to mitigate the impact of those policies on the EU ETS during Phase IV.\nThe MSR reviews scheduled in 2021 and 2026 will be key to assess the accuracy of its parameters to mitigate ex-post the effects of overlapping policies on the EU ETS which targets have been significantly reinforced last June.\nQuestions to be discussed during this meeting \n\nThe MSR parameters were adjusted a while ago but we are currently facing a new situation – whatare developments that need to be taken into account in light of the review cycle? (e.g. new targets for EE and RES; changes in economic growth and forecasts for the future; new provisions for the 4thPhase adopted this year\, etc.)\nHow will this new context influence the behaviour of players on the ETS market and to what extent will the MSR\, with its current parameters\, be able to remove future unexpected unbalances (e.g. impact on the evolution of the carbon price\, etc.)\nWhat are possible changes in hedging behaviour? If significant changes occur\, what impact will it have on the market?\nHow should proposals to modify the MSR design be analysed and judged? What should be changed to ensure the MSR is resilient?\n\n \nWorkshop Materials:\nAgenda\nPresentation by ERCST\nPräsentation by S. P. Schleicher\nPresentation by T. Buckley\nPresentation by R. Trotignon\nPresentation by J. Ackva\nPresentation by P. Ruf\n \nRelated Events\nInternational Townhall: CBAM in an International ContextJune 23 @ 14:30 - 16:30\n2026 State of ETS – LaunchMay 20 @ 15:00 - 16:30Launch Event – Carbon Leakage under CBAM and Free AllocationMay 13 @ 10:30 - 12:30Launch Event – 2026 ETS ReviewApril 23 @ 10:00 - 12:00
URL:https://ercst.org/event/eu-ets-impacts-of-the-new-clean-energy-package-targets-on-the-msr/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR